New recipes

Starbucks Sued for Fraud After Under-Filling Lattes

Starbucks Sued for Fraud After Under-Filling Lattes


A class-action lawsuit filed against Starbucks by two eagle-eyed Americans alleges that the company regularly and purposefully under-fills its lattes by at least 25 percent, an intentional act of fraud.

By using less milk in its Tall, Grande, and Venti cups, the company “has saved countless millions of dollars in the cost of goods sold and was unjustly enriched by taking payment for more product than it delivers,” the suit alleges.

Starbucks distributed standardized pitchers in 2009 with “fill lines” for milk, instituting a “uniform system of under-filling the lattes,” according to Law360.

“For instance, in making a “grande” 16-ounce latte, baristas are required to use 12 ounces of milk, plus two 1-ounce shots of espresso. Therefore, the maximum possible fluid ounce amount of latte a customer could possibly receive is 14 ounces.

“Perhaps most significantly, the [plaintiffs, Siera Strumlauf and Benjamin Robles of California] contend that the cups Starbucks uses for its 12-, 16- and 20-ounce lattes can hold exactly those amounts if they are filled completely to the top brim. But as a rule, Starbucks employees are instructed to leave a quarter-inch of space from the top of the cup. From a logical standpoint, that means that no cup Starbucks uses could possibly contain the alleged serving size, and every drink is filled less than the amount advertised.”

If the customers had known that Starbucks baristas were under-filling their drinks, neither would have spent $4 each time on 16-ounce lattes, according to court documents.

“When a standard recipe is used to create a drink that is purportedly 16 fluid ounces, the resulting beverage should in fact be 16 fluid ounces,” Strumlauf and Robles wrote. “In connection with these cost-saving measures, Starbucks knew that the etched ‘fill to’ lines in its steaming pitchers resulted in under-filled beverages. Yet Starbucks continued to advertise its Tall beverages as ‘12 fl. oz.,’ its Grande beverages as ‘16 fl. oz.’ and its Venti beverages as ‘20 fl. oz.’”

A representative for Starbucks dismissed the lawsuit as “without merit,” and insisted that, “Due to the inherent variations with handcrafted beverages in our cafes, we inform customers of the likelihood of variations.”


Starbucks sued, accused of purposely under filling lattes

article

WALNUT CREEK, Calif. (FOX 13) - Coffee giant Starbucks has long been under fire for its drink prices and name spellings, but the company now faces legal action for something many seem to agree is a problem - under filled cups. 

Court records filed March 16 in the U.S. District Court of Northern California show Siera Strumlaufਊnd Benjamin Robles filed suit on behalf of themselves and anyone who&aposs ever ordered a Starbucks beverage. The suit alleges the company&aposs many flavors of lattes are "uniformly underfilled" based on a standard recipe. 

The filing states, "Tall Lattes are not 12 fluid ounces, Grande Lattes are not 16 fluid ounces, and Venti Lattes are not 20 fluid ounces. Starbucks cheats purchasers by providing less fluid ounces in their Lattes than represented. In fact, Starbucks Lattes are approximately 25% underfilled."

The suit continues to explain Starbucks uses standardized recipes to cut costs. However, Starbucks is accused of crafting its recipes to insure under filled cups. Additionally, the suit says Starbucks&apos cups are too small to accommodate the promised amount of liquid for each size. 

The suit ultimately states Starbucks executives made a conscious decision to under fill lattes to save money on milk - one of its most expensive ingredients. 

Several California laws are cited in the suit, including the state&aposs false advertising law and its unfair competition law. 

The suit calls for compensation and punitive damages for anyone who has ever purchased a Starbucks latte - of any flavor or size - since 2009 when the company put its standardized recipes into place. So basically, everyone. 


Starbucks sued, accused of purposely under filling lattes

article

WALNUT CREEK, Calif. (FOX 13) - Coffee giant Starbucks has long been under fire for its drink prices and name spellings, but the company now faces legal action for something many seem to agree is a problem - under filled cups. 

Court records filed March 16 in the U.S. District Court of Northern California show Siera Strumlaufਊnd Benjamin Robles filed suit on behalf of themselves and anyone who&aposs ever ordered a Starbucks beverage. The suit alleges the company&aposs many flavors of lattes are "uniformly underfilled" based on a standard recipe. 

The filing states, "Tall Lattes are not 12 fluid ounces, Grande Lattes are not 16 fluid ounces, and Venti Lattes are not 20 fluid ounces. Starbucks cheats purchasers by providing less fluid ounces in their Lattes than represented. In fact, Starbucks Lattes are approximately 25% underfilled."

The suit continues to explain Starbucks uses standardized recipes to cut costs. However, Starbucks is accused of crafting its recipes to insure under filled cups. Additionally, the suit says Starbucks&apos cups are too small to accommodate the promised amount of liquid for each size. 

The suit ultimately states Starbucks executives made a conscious decision to under fill lattes to save money on milk - one of its most expensive ingredients. 

Several California laws are cited in the suit, including the state&aposs false advertising law and its unfair competition law. 

The suit calls for compensation and punitive damages for anyone who has ever purchased a Starbucks latte - of any flavor or size - since 2009 when the company put its standardized recipes into place. So basically, everyone. 


Starbucks sued, accused of purposely under filling lattes

article

WALNUT CREEK, Calif. (FOX 13) - Coffee giant Starbucks has long been under fire for its drink prices and name spellings, but the company now faces legal action for something many seem to agree is a problem - under filled cups. 

Court records filed March 16 in the U.S. District Court of Northern California show Siera Strumlaufਊnd Benjamin Robles filed suit on behalf of themselves and anyone who&aposs ever ordered a Starbucks beverage. The suit alleges the company&aposs many flavors of lattes are "uniformly underfilled" based on a standard recipe. 

The filing states, "Tall Lattes are not 12 fluid ounces, Grande Lattes are not 16 fluid ounces, and Venti Lattes are not 20 fluid ounces. Starbucks cheats purchasers by providing less fluid ounces in their Lattes than represented. In fact, Starbucks Lattes are approximately 25% underfilled."

The suit continues to explain Starbucks uses standardized recipes to cut costs. However, Starbucks is accused of crafting its recipes to insure under filled cups. Additionally, the suit says Starbucks&apos cups are too small to accommodate the promised amount of liquid for each size. 

The suit ultimately states Starbucks executives made a conscious decision to under fill lattes to save money on milk - one of its most expensive ingredients. 

Several California laws are cited in the suit, including the state&aposs false advertising law and its unfair competition law. 

The suit calls for compensation and punitive damages for anyone who has ever purchased a Starbucks latte - of any flavor or size - since 2009 when the company put its standardized recipes into place. So basically, everyone. 


Starbucks sued, accused of purposely under filling lattes

article

WALNUT CREEK, Calif. (FOX 13) - Coffee giant Starbucks has long been under fire for its drink prices and name spellings, but the company now faces legal action for something many seem to agree is a problem - under filled cups. 

Court records filed March 16 in the U.S. District Court of Northern California show Siera Strumlaufਊnd Benjamin Robles filed suit on behalf of themselves and anyone who&aposs ever ordered a Starbucks beverage. The suit alleges the company&aposs many flavors of lattes are "uniformly underfilled" based on a standard recipe. 

The filing states, "Tall Lattes are not 12 fluid ounces, Grande Lattes are not 16 fluid ounces, and Venti Lattes are not 20 fluid ounces. Starbucks cheats purchasers by providing less fluid ounces in their Lattes than represented. In fact, Starbucks Lattes are approximately 25% underfilled."

The suit continues to explain Starbucks uses standardized recipes to cut costs. However, Starbucks is accused of crafting its recipes to insure under filled cups. Additionally, the suit says Starbucks&apos cups are too small to accommodate the promised amount of liquid for each size. 

The suit ultimately states Starbucks executives made a conscious decision to under fill lattes to save money on milk - one of its most expensive ingredients. 

Several California laws are cited in the suit, including the state&aposs false advertising law and its unfair competition law. 

The suit calls for compensation and punitive damages for anyone who has ever purchased a Starbucks latte - of any flavor or size - since 2009 when the company put its standardized recipes into place. So basically, everyone. 


Starbucks sued, accused of purposely under filling lattes

article

WALNUT CREEK, Calif. (FOX 13) - Coffee giant Starbucks has long been under fire for its drink prices and name spellings, but the company now faces legal action for something many seem to agree is a problem - under filled cups. 

Court records filed March 16 in the U.S. District Court of Northern California show Siera Strumlaufਊnd Benjamin Robles filed suit on behalf of themselves and anyone who&aposs ever ordered a Starbucks beverage. The suit alleges the company&aposs many flavors of lattes are "uniformly underfilled" based on a standard recipe. 

The filing states, "Tall Lattes are not 12 fluid ounces, Grande Lattes are not 16 fluid ounces, and Venti Lattes are not 20 fluid ounces. Starbucks cheats purchasers by providing less fluid ounces in their Lattes than represented. In fact, Starbucks Lattes are approximately 25% underfilled."

The suit continues to explain Starbucks uses standardized recipes to cut costs. However, Starbucks is accused of crafting its recipes to insure under filled cups. Additionally, the suit says Starbucks&apos cups are too small to accommodate the promised amount of liquid for each size. 

The suit ultimately states Starbucks executives made a conscious decision to under fill lattes to save money on milk - one of its most expensive ingredients. 

Several California laws are cited in the suit, including the state&aposs false advertising law and its unfair competition law. 

The suit calls for compensation and punitive damages for anyone who has ever purchased a Starbucks latte - of any flavor or size - since 2009 when the company put its standardized recipes into place. So basically, everyone. 


Starbucks sued, accused of purposely under filling lattes

article

WALNUT CREEK, Calif. (FOX 13) - Coffee giant Starbucks has long been under fire for its drink prices and name spellings, but the company now faces legal action for something many seem to agree is a problem - under filled cups. 

Court records filed March 16 in the U.S. District Court of Northern California show Siera Strumlaufਊnd Benjamin Robles filed suit on behalf of themselves and anyone who&aposs ever ordered a Starbucks beverage. The suit alleges the company&aposs many flavors of lattes are "uniformly underfilled" based on a standard recipe. 

The filing states, "Tall Lattes are not 12 fluid ounces, Grande Lattes are not 16 fluid ounces, and Venti Lattes are not 20 fluid ounces. Starbucks cheats purchasers by providing less fluid ounces in their Lattes than represented. In fact, Starbucks Lattes are approximately 25% underfilled."

The suit continues to explain Starbucks uses standardized recipes to cut costs. However, Starbucks is accused of crafting its recipes to insure under filled cups. Additionally, the suit says Starbucks&apos cups are too small to accommodate the promised amount of liquid for each size. 

The suit ultimately states Starbucks executives made a conscious decision to under fill lattes to save money on milk - one of its most expensive ingredients. 

Several California laws are cited in the suit, including the state&aposs false advertising law and its unfair competition law. 

The suit calls for compensation and punitive damages for anyone who has ever purchased a Starbucks latte - of any flavor or size - since 2009 when the company put its standardized recipes into place. So basically, everyone. 


Starbucks sued, accused of purposely under filling lattes

article

WALNUT CREEK, Calif. (FOX 13) - Coffee giant Starbucks has long been under fire for its drink prices and name spellings, but the company now faces legal action for something many seem to agree is a problem - under filled cups. 

Court records filed March 16 in the U.S. District Court of Northern California show Siera Strumlaufਊnd Benjamin Robles filed suit on behalf of themselves and anyone who&aposs ever ordered a Starbucks beverage. The suit alleges the company&aposs many flavors of lattes are "uniformly underfilled" based on a standard recipe. 

The filing states, "Tall Lattes are not 12 fluid ounces, Grande Lattes are not 16 fluid ounces, and Venti Lattes are not 20 fluid ounces. Starbucks cheats purchasers by providing less fluid ounces in their Lattes than represented. In fact, Starbucks Lattes are approximately 25% underfilled."

The suit continues to explain Starbucks uses standardized recipes to cut costs. However, Starbucks is accused of crafting its recipes to insure under filled cups. Additionally, the suit says Starbucks&apos cups are too small to accommodate the promised amount of liquid for each size. 

The suit ultimately states Starbucks executives made a conscious decision to under fill lattes to save money on milk - one of its most expensive ingredients. 

Several California laws are cited in the suit, including the state&aposs false advertising law and its unfair competition law. 

The suit calls for compensation and punitive damages for anyone who has ever purchased a Starbucks latte - of any flavor or size - since 2009 when the company put its standardized recipes into place. So basically, everyone. 


Starbucks sued, accused of purposely under filling lattes

article

WALNUT CREEK, Calif. (FOX 13) - Coffee giant Starbucks has long been under fire for its drink prices and name spellings, but the company now faces legal action for something many seem to agree is a problem - under filled cups. 

Court records filed March 16 in the U.S. District Court of Northern California show Siera Strumlaufਊnd Benjamin Robles filed suit on behalf of themselves and anyone who&aposs ever ordered a Starbucks beverage. The suit alleges the company&aposs many flavors of lattes are "uniformly underfilled" based on a standard recipe. 

The filing states, "Tall Lattes are not 12 fluid ounces, Grande Lattes are not 16 fluid ounces, and Venti Lattes are not 20 fluid ounces. Starbucks cheats purchasers by providing less fluid ounces in their Lattes than represented. In fact, Starbucks Lattes are approximately 25% underfilled."

The suit continues to explain Starbucks uses standardized recipes to cut costs. However, Starbucks is accused of crafting its recipes to insure under filled cups. Additionally, the suit says Starbucks&apos cups are too small to accommodate the promised amount of liquid for each size. 

The suit ultimately states Starbucks executives made a conscious decision to under fill lattes to save money on milk - one of its most expensive ingredients. 

Several California laws are cited in the suit, including the state&aposs false advertising law and its unfair competition law. 

The suit calls for compensation and punitive damages for anyone who has ever purchased a Starbucks latte - of any flavor or size - since 2009 when the company put its standardized recipes into place. So basically, everyone. 


Starbucks sued, accused of purposely under filling lattes

article

WALNUT CREEK, Calif. (FOX 13) - Coffee giant Starbucks has long been under fire for its drink prices and name spellings, but the company now faces legal action for something many seem to agree is a problem - under filled cups. 

Court records filed March 16 in the U.S. District Court of Northern California show Siera Strumlaufਊnd Benjamin Robles filed suit on behalf of themselves and anyone who&aposs ever ordered a Starbucks beverage. The suit alleges the company&aposs many flavors of lattes are "uniformly underfilled" based on a standard recipe. 

The filing states, "Tall Lattes are not 12 fluid ounces, Grande Lattes are not 16 fluid ounces, and Venti Lattes are not 20 fluid ounces. Starbucks cheats purchasers by providing less fluid ounces in their Lattes than represented. In fact, Starbucks Lattes are approximately 25% underfilled."

The suit continues to explain Starbucks uses standardized recipes to cut costs. However, Starbucks is accused of crafting its recipes to insure under filled cups. Additionally, the suit says Starbucks&apos cups are too small to accommodate the promised amount of liquid for each size. 

The suit ultimately states Starbucks executives made a conscious decision to under fill lattes to save money on milk - one of its most expensive ingredients. 

Several California laws are cited in the suit, including the state&aposs false advertising law and its unfair competition law. 

The suit calls for compensation and punitive damages for anyone who has ever purchased a Starbucks latte - of any flavor or size - since 2009 when the company put its standardized recipes into place. So basically, everyone. 


Starbucks sued, accused of purposely under filling lattes

article

WALNUT CREEK, Calif. (FOX 13) - Coffee giant Starbucks has long been under fire for its drink prices and name spellings, but the company now faces legal action for something many seem to agree is a problem - under filled cups. 

Court records filed March 16 in the U.S. District Court of Northern California show Siera Strumlaufਊnd Benjamin Robles filed suit on behalf of themselves and anyone who&aposs ever ordered a Starbucks beverage. The suit alleges the company&aposs many flavors of lattes are "uniformly underfilled" based on a standard recipe. 

The filing states, "Tall Lattes are not 12 fluid ounces, Grande Lattes are not 16 fluid ounces, and Venti Lattes are not 20 fluid ounces. Starbucks cheats purchasers by providing less fluid ounces in their Lattes than represented. In fact, Starbucks Lattes are approximately 25% underfilled."

The suit continues to explain Starbucks uses standardized recipes to cut costs. However, Starbucks is accused of crafting its recipes to insure under filled cups. Additionally, the suit says Starbucks&apos cups are too small to accommodate the promised amount of liquid for each size. 

The suit ultimately states Starbucks executives made a conscious decision to under fill lattes to save money on milk - one of its most expensive ingredients. 

Several California laws are cited in the suit, including the state&aposs false advertising law and its unfair competition law. 

The suit calls for compensation and punitive damages for anyone who has ever purchased a Starbucks latte - of any flavor or size - since 2009 when the company put its standardized recipes into place. So basically, everyone. 


Watch the video: COPYCAT STARBUCKS Caramel Macchiato Hot u0026 Cold Recipes. Feat. MINOS Moka Pot Espresso Maker